Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David After Dentist (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Yash! (Y) 00:32, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

David After Dentist (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The fact that a one event internet video is considered notable for wikipedia standards is absurd to me. It might have coverage but WP:ONEEVENT isn't notable. LADY LOTUSTALK 12:07, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - From WP:1E "When an individual is significant for his or her role in a single event, it may be unclear whether an article should be written about the individual, the event or both." Since this article is about the "event", (of sorts) this is perfectly fine. ― Padenton|   16:04, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ― Padenton|   16:31, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ Geoff Weiss (13 March 2014). "'David After Dentist' Dad Now Wants Christianity to Go Viral". Entrepreneur.
  2. ^ David DeVore, special to HLN. "'David After Dentist': Raising a viral kid". HLNtv.com.
  3. ^ http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/16/fashion/16meme.html?_r=0
  4. ^ http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/16/2009s-most-contagious-viral-video/
  5. ^ http://parenting.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/16/exploiting-kids-on-youtube/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0
  6. ^ http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv-movies/joseph-gordon-levitt-perfectly-recreates-david-dentist-article-1.1714220
  7. ^ http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/22/david-after-dentist-and-a-new-brush-with-fame/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.